Length: 4-6 typed, double-spaced pages

write a paper in which you put two of The Sunflower respondents into a dialogue in order to accurately reflect the complexity of their arguments. You can choose anyone from The Symposium except the six we have already discussed in class respondents should represent different perspectives on the issue of forgiveness, though they might have some common areas of agreement. This dialogue should foreground the respondents’ positions on forgiveness, honoring the complexity of their ideas with clarity and accuracy. You should set the dialogue in particular content talk show, a game show, a walk through the park, and you might also employ a moderator, or host, to ask questions and mediate the conversation.

Primary Purpose of the Paper: To put at least two respondents into a dialogue that clearly and accurately reflects the complexity of their views on forgiveness. Remember, this is a dialogue, or conversation not an argument-and your purpose is to make clear both respondents’ views on forgiveness. Although they will express disagreement, their goal is not to win the argument but to come to a more enlightened understanding of each other. Audience: Readers who are familiar with Simon Wiesenthal’s central narrative and question in The Sunflower, but who may not be familiar with your two respondents.

Grading Criteria: 1. Does the paper put at least two respondents into a dialogue that clearly and accurately reflects the complexity of their views on forgiveness?

2. Is the dialogue structured clearly and smoothly so that readers can follow the sequence of the respondents’ thoughts on forgiveness?

3. Is the dialogue given a creative context to help clarify and mediate the conversation? 4. Is the dialogue mostly free of grammatical and mechanical errors that might interfere with a reader’s understanding?

The scenario I chose was a short summery of the story of the book which I will provide, basically this scenario is written on a website blog (you can name the website whatever you want), at the end of the summery, Simon’s question will be addressed again, asking people for their opinions, then the two responders will argue in dialogue as comments and reply’s, a third person( whoever wrote the blog) will comment in-between sometimes contradicting their argument by finding holes in their supporting tools until they reach to a conclusion( it doesn’t have to be yes or no only a warrant that conclude both of their argument)

Looking for solution of this Assignment?


We deliver quality original papers

Our experts write quality original papers using academic databases.We dont use AI in our work. We refund your money if AI is detected  

Free revisions

We offer our clients multiple free revisions just to ensure you get what you want.

Discounted prices

All our prices are discounted which makes it affordable to you. Use code FIRST15 to get your discount

100% originality

We deliver papers that are written from scratch to deliver 100% originality. Our papers are free from plagiarism and NO similarity.We have ZERO TOLERANCE TO USE OF AI

On-time delivery

We will deliver your paper on time even on short notice or  short deadline, overnight essay or even an urgent essay