i need a draft for my final writing assignment also please

Below are the details related to your final writing assignment.

Here is a timeline associated with the final writing assignment:

Task	Date
Draft Due Date	Module 6: 10-1-19
Peer Review	Module 6: Starts on 10-2-19 / Peer Review must be completed by 10-9-19
Revisions and Final Paper Submission	You can make revisions based on Peer Review from 10-9-19 through 10-11-19. Your final paper must be submitted in Canvas by the final course day (10-11-19).

Want to know how you will be graded? Review the rubric that is attached to this assignment.

CASE SCENARIO / ASSIGNMENT DETAILS

Overview: In the Phoenix, Arizona, area in 1991-1992, a series of more than seven rapes was widely publicized. The victims had accepted rides from a white male they variously described as being between 20 and 40 years old, who drove into outlying desert areas, where he assaulted them and released them near well-traveled roads. Local media referred to the assailant as the “baby-seat rapist” because in two (or possibly three; one victim’s account was inconsistent) cases the assailant’s vehicle carried a child’s car seat.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s office prosecuted and convicted Scott Lehr to death. However, numerous questions exist as to whether they “caught and prosecuted” the right suspect.

YOUR JOB: Using the knowledge you have gained from this course (along with the materials below), you need to author a two page reflection about the guilt or innocence of Scott Lehr. Use this Word template to develop your response (you can delete the questions and other details when you are ready to submit your work).

For background information on the case, use the following materials:

1. PowerPoint Overview: This PowerPoint was created by a student who researched the Baby Seat Rapist case. Of particular importance, the student outlines the various suspects that police interviewed associated with the murders. There are details relating to each suspect’s background.
2. Website (Links to an external site.): This website was designed by individuals who are trying to seek justice for Scott Lehr. They believe he is innocent and that prosecutors failed to disclose information about the case to jurors. REMEMBER — consider this evidence. You have to render a final decision.
3. Book Excerpt: An author, Mary Lash, wrote a book entitled, The Desert Murders: How Junk Science, Witness Contamination, and Arizona Politics Condemned an Innocent Man. I have copied several chapters for you to use in your consideration of this case.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Requirements

Full Marks 2 pages – double spaced. 12 point / Times New Roman. When citing course material be as specific as possible – example (Course Lecture – Victims Demographic)

Want to know how you will be graded? Review the rubric that is attached to this assignment.

Rubric

Criteria	Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Background	Full Marks A paragraph that provides an overview of the case. This would include details related to “why” the suspect was considered a serial murderer. No Marks
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfiling Analysis	Full Marks A paragraph that describes / analyzes the details of the case through the lens of a “profiler”. This is where the four crime phase typology would be important. No Marks
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Connections	Full Marks Two-three paragraphs that connect important aspects of the case to what we learned in class about serial murderers. For example, what myths fit or do not fit the offender, were there patterns that match that of a serial murder — or is this just a series of random homicide cases? What do we know about the victims – do their characteristics connect to the offender (i.e. method). No Marks
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProsecution Assessment	Full Marks Final assessment (one paragraph). Did the prosecutors get it right? You get to decide this. No Marks
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Requirements	Full Marks 2 pages – double spaced. 12 point / Times New Roman. When citing course material be as specific as possible – example (Course Lecture – Victims Demographic) No Marks
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar	Full Marks High level of quality in terms of spelling and grammar. In other words, it is clear that you proofread your paper before submitting it. No Marks
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations Format – Quality	Full Marks High level of quality in terms of correct formatting of citations. No Marks

Next

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

We deliver quality original papers	Our experts write quality original papers using academic databases.We dont use AI in our work. We refund your money if AI is detected
Free revisions	We offer our clients multiple free revisions just to ensure you get what you want.
Discounted prices	All our prices are discounted which makes it affordable to you. Use code FIRST15 to get your discount
100% originality	We deliver papers that are written from scratch to deliver 100% originality. Our papers are free from plagiarism and NO similarity.We have ZERO TOLERANCE TO USE OF AI
On-time delivery	We will deliver your paper on time even on short notice or  short deadline, overnight essay or even an urgent essay