Choose any of these topics. Always avoid arguing the obvious or overused and boring topics. This list in my textbook is at the end of Chapter 11. Find that list for more details and ideas or work from your own thoughts on these.

1. Past/present topic:

2. What you thought something would be and what it was really like:

3. A which is better topic:

4. Two contrasting types of people

5. Two contrasting (but sometimes confused) emotions or character traits.

Though comparison and contrast techniques may both be used, your paper should primarily be either comparison (two things that seem to be different but are actually very much alike) or contrast (two things that seem to be similar but are actually very different).

Your paper should have a title, be single spaced with one line between each of its paragraphs (at least five). No huge, weird, fonts. Have a clear thesis in your first paragraph.

Topics to Never Write About

Students: 1) Pregnancy – no papers about having babies or overcoming the difficulty of being a single mom in school, etc

2) Bullying, or any other topic you often hear on the news.

3) Football games or any winning game

4) Cheerleading

5) Drug use or legalization, gun control, abortion, your run-in with law, drunk driving,

6) Never write a rant or anything that is anti-American. I expect my students to be patriotic.

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

TOPIC: GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER

For Week 6 of the course there will not be a case study given to you by the faculty. Instead you will be assigned a mental health disorder commonly seen in primary care and you will create a case study based on that disorder. You may create a case study either from a previous clinical patient experience or if you have not had a patient in clinical that represents your assigned topic you may research your disease using the week’s classroom material and the evidence-based literature in the field. The case should be clear and include all elements of a normal case that might be presented in class (subjective, objective, assessment, and full 5 point plan).  The clinical practicum documentation will be helpful for this process, or notes you have taken in clinical regarding cases.  The case should be clear, organized, and meet the following guidelines

This part goes in part one and should begin with subjective and objective data just like we do in your weekly case study discussion.  Do not put diagnosis until your peers respond.

WEEK 6 Part One Specific Guidelines:

If this is an actual patient from clinical- Include their actual chief complaint, demographic data, HPI, PMHX, PSHX, medications, allergies, subjective and objective findings without identifying the patient’s name.

If this is a fictitious case you’ve created from the literature/readings you should design an example patient and include chief complaint, demographic data, HPI, PMHX, PSHX, medications and allergies, subjective and objective findings. Be mindful that the background data for the case should bear some relevance to the diagnosis.

The case should not be overly simple. Like your weekly case studies, it should include subjective data that loosely represents the diagnosis you have been given, but includes some elements of the pathophysiology/presentation of the disease.

You must include the following elements in part one: subjective: chief complaint/HPI, demographic data, HPI, PMHX, PSHX, subjective and objective findings.

Post contributes clinically accurate perspectives/insights applicable to the results from the physical exam and diagnoses. Initial post includes the most likely diagnosis/specific treatment plan given case study information supported by rationale and answers all questions presented in the case. Demonstrates course knowledge/assigned readings by: linking tests/interventions accurately to diagnoses, applies learned knowledge specifically to the symptoms and patient information using original dialogue i.e., little to no direct quotes.

Discussion post supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last five years. Focus of journal articles represents a logical link between the article content and the case study information. In-text citations and full references are provided.

Discussion post presented in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. Headings reflect separation of criterion outlined in assignment guidelines.

**Direct quote should not exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion

Discussion post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.

* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Click on the link below to read the article “Selfie Deaths are an Epidemic”

https://www.outsideonline.com/2393419/selfie-deaths (Links to an external site.)

Answer the following questions

1. What was the most interesting thing you learned from reading this article?

2. Have you ever taken a selfie that compromised your safety for the sake of a good picture?

3. Do you know anyone personally that has ever been injured taking a selfie or video to post on social media?

4. Why do you think selfies are so popular?

5. Do you have a hard time going someplace and not taking a picture (whether you post it on social media or not).

6. How many times do you post on social media per day, per week, per month?

https://www.outsideonline.com/2393419/selfie-deaths

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Describe a specific example of groupthink you have witnessed in your personal or professional life. Explain what factors contributed to this example of groupthink and how the outcome may have been different had groupthink not occurred. Connect your response to at least one other concept we’ve explored this week (such as in-groups and out-groups, roles, or social institutions).

• Introduction to Sociology, Chapter 2, Sections 2.1 – 2.6 and Chapter 2 Summary
• Introduction to Sociology, Chapter 4, Sections 4.1 – 4.4, and 4.10
• Haslam, S. & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s Studies Really Show. Plos Biology, 10(11), 1-4. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?