The subjects for the residency weekend include:

• Current State of IoT Security
  • Introduce how IoT has penetrated the market
  • Research 2 – 3 IoT security breaches
    • Present the history of the attacks and affected devices
    • Talk about how they could have been prevented
    • Discuss any reputation loss or business loss by the company(s) of these hacks
  • Present the security outlook for these company(s) or for IoT as a whole
• Which browser is more secure?
  • Compare 3 modern browsers with available research data.
  • Present studies that have compared the browsers or aspects of the browsers in a literature review.
  • Make your recommendation after comparing (a minimal of 5 previous pieces of research).
• Lessons learned from the Mirai Botnet attack of 2016
  • Research the history of the attack and those responsible.
  • What did this exploit?
  • Why was it so much more effective than previous BotNet designs?
  • What kind of mitigations would you recommend for protection?
• Can a BYOD policy be intrusive and unethical?
  • Research the ethical debates of MDM software on personal devices.
  • Compare presentations of lessons learned on BYOD implementations.
  • Develop a BYOD policy, in conjunction with a deployment of an MDM device for a medium sized hospital.
  • • • What compliance issues and ethical issues are there to overcome?
      • Can you find a complete solution that covers CIA for the BYOD policy and MDM deployment?
  • RESEARCH PAPER GUIDELINES
  • State the research question you are trying to answer (You will pick 1 of the topics available as a group)
  • State why the question is important
  • State the issues involved
  • State why we should be concerned with resolving whatever issues are involved
  • State how answering the question will help us
  • State the implications and consequences of dealing with or resolving the issues involved

  REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
  Identify who has tried to answer the question before by doing the following:

  • Summarize how each of the sources presents and deals with the subject
  • Explain how each source presents and deals with its findings or results
  • Explain the relevancy of each source to your research question
  • State what you learned from each of your sources
  • State in what way(s) each source contributes to answering your research question

  DISCUSSION
  State your answer to your research question
  State how and elaborate on how, explain how, illustrate how each of the sources you previously reviewed help you answer your research question
  State what questions about your topic you still have that your sources may not have answered

  CONCLUSIONS
  State the conclusions regarding your topic you have reached from having surveyed, interpreted, evaluated the literature
  Indicate how each of the sources have contributed to your conclusions (and clearly, accurately, correctly document those sources within your text)
  State the implications of your conclusions
  State what might be the possible consequences of your conclusions
  State the social significance these implications and consequences might have

  DOCUMENTATION
  On a separate page, include a section labeled References which provides the full publication information for all the sources you used in your paper
  You should have a MINIMUM of four(4) sources for your paper, one of which much be peer reviewed.
  Not meeting this minimum requirement of four (3) sources will lead to a lower evaluation of your paper for each missing source
  Use APA format for documenting your sources-For APA help: Purdue OWL
  -For more details on journal types, refer to this link: Rutgers Library

Min 12 pages required.

9 mins ago

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Remember, your position for this assignment is to legalize aid in dying.

The reason we have these two position paper topics (aid in dying and the death penalty) is precisely because reasonable people can stand on either side–initially, if you oppose aid in dying, or you want the death penalty, ok, you are not alone; but this paper pattern is set-up primarily so each student can learn effective organizational patterns, how to use sources effectively, and how to use a variety of strategies–logical, emotional, and ethical–to support and counter. Just get through these assignments and focus on learning the pattern.

First, carefully watch the Seattle Channel video, and then develop one counterargument from the Seattle Channel video; first, focus on the debate between Dr. Susan Rutherford and Counselor Arline Hinckley.

You need to summarize and paraphrase just one complete counter-argument. Remember, if you use the actual, exact wording, you must wrap that phrase in quotation marks (integrated quotes).

Remember, a counter-argument is Two parts: first, you present the objection, and then you counter it. It might help you understand this two-part distinction by simply adding a question mark to the objection. Please note that one source, one paragraph–so you will have two paragraphs for this assignment: the first paragraph presents the objection, with a source, and the second paragraph counters, also with a source. Remember, from here on out, we are writing source-based papers (not reflections or responses)!

For example, start your first line with the following sub-title:

Too Depressed to Make a Rational Decision? Then hit the enter key so your first complete sentence will be the claim statement of Dr. Susan Rutherford’s objection: According to Dr. Susan Rutherford, MD, ‘terminally ill patients are too depressed to make a rational decision.” This claim statement will then be followed by one or two of her supporting sentences.

Hit the enter key and then you counter it in a new paragraph with a summary by Arline Hinckley. Make sense? So, now, you will have at least two complete paragraphs, making-up one counter-argument.

Link for the video: http://www.seattlechannel.org/explore-videos?videoid=x31455 (Links to an external site.)

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

use “Times New Roman Font” with 1.5 space all answers.

The task should not show more than 25% plagiarism.

word forat only .

no matching ratio

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Resource: leadership book of your choice

Due Thursday (20 pts)

Write a 175- to 265-word response to the following:

• What have you learned so far?
• What items would you like to share with the class?
• What resources (e.g., presentation, video, music) are useful in understanding leadership the way it is presented in the book?
• Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references.

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Complete the Decision-Making Technique Matrix.

Submit your assignment.

APA format if needed

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?