After reading Chapter 4 and reviewing the lecture power point (located in lectures tab), please answer the following questions. Each question must have at least 3 paragraphs and you must use at 4 least references included in your post.

The format has to be APA Format, Plagiarism will not be tolerated, it result in an automatic 0. The assignment is going to be checked by Turnitin by the professor to detect Plagiarism.

Discussion board questions:

1. Think about the ethical theories and approaches in Chapter 4 and the moral conflicts you have experienced in the past. Have you used one of these approaches to resolving conflict? Which theory or approach have you used?

2. Has there ever been a time when you have experienced the dilemma of having to make a choice that you know will affect the well-being of another individual? Have you ever experienced moral suffering?

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Please follow rubric

You must submit replies with 150 – 200 words in every module/week in which the forum is assigned. Each reply should be supported by personal experience, scripture, and/or academic references. In addition, if any “experts” are quoted, support your opinion using current APA format.

“Content area literacy focuses on study skills that can be used to help students learn from subject matter specific texts. Disciplinary literacy, in contrast, is an emphasis on the knowledge and abilities possessed by those who create, communicate, and use knowledge within the disciplines,” (Shanahan & Shanahan, 2012, p. 8). This implies that the content strategies are cross-curricular, and disciplinary literacy strategies are specific to the content area. For example, students analyze materials in all classes, but how they interpret them is different. Students in an English class will analyze a story differently from examining documents in a history class.

From experience with disciplinary literacy, teachers must value the ability to make connects. Disciplinary literacy builds upon itself. What a student learns in elementary school about reading and writing will apply in their high school classes. When students learn how to make inferences, they will apply that reading in specific content areas.

When teachers want to implement disciplinary reading opportunities, they must think about how the content aligns with the 21st Century learner and create assignments that are authentic in nature (Chauvin & Theodore, 2015, p. 3-5). According to Chauvin and Theodore, assessments should allow students to use resources outside of the classroom and adhere to their interests and strengths (Chauvin & Theodore, 2015, p. 5). This approach can lend itself to problem-based Learning. This method can allow for students to think critically.

Being a high school social studies teacher, I often think about the appropriate ways to include disciplinary literacy in my lessons. For students to read and write like a historian, they have to be able to scan documents and decipher various points of view, understand the information in different contexts, and make connections. One way in which I am able to do this is by using document bases questions (DBQs). The purpose of a DBQ is not to assess knowledge but to teach a skill. DBQs allow students to evaluate information as a historian would. DBQs enable students to read multiple documents and create an opinion based on the question. Students also become privy to the language that is to be used in a history course. When using DBQs, I like to teach students the Advanced Placement acronym SOAP. This acronym helps students to understand the documents better. When concluding a DBQ, there is a required essay, where students are taught how to use evidence to support claims. All of these instructional strategies combined better prepare students for disciplinary reading in the future.

Chauvin, R., and Theodore, K. (2015). Teaching content-area literacy and disciplinary literacy. SEDL Insights, 3(1), 1-10.

Shanahan, T. and Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7-18. https://crlp.ucsc.edu/resources/downloads/Shanahan%20What%20is%20Disciplinary%20Literacy.pdf

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

CS 320 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview: In this milestone, you have the opportunity to practice and receive feedback on the summary section of your final project. The following prompt is a more specific list of the same essential questions that you will need to address in your final submission but with added details and supporting information to assist you in successfully meeting the requirements. Prompt: Describe your experience developing and writing JUnit tests for each of the three features by addressing each of the following questions:  How many JUnit tests did you create for each of the features (i.e., Doctor Information Feature, Medical Records Feature, and Allergy Find Feature) and why? In other words, what was your level of testing for each of the features? Explain your reasoning based on the best practices you have learned in the course.  How did you organize your tests for each of the features? For example, did you group any of your tests into test suites for any of the features? Why or why not? Explain your reasoning based on the best practices you have learned in the course.  Did you address all the software requirements? Describe how you met each of the requirements from the test plan (listed below). ○ Doctor Information Feature Requirement: The system shall allow the user to log in and add a doctor to the list of doctors. Doctors’ names do not have to be unique, but doctors’ IDs should be unique. ○ Medical Records Feature Requirement: The system shall allow the user to add a medical record to a patient. i. Add a patient. ii. Add a medical record with treatments, medications, and allergies. o When you create a medical record, it is necessary to create a patient history, which will contain 1 to many treatments, 1 to many medications, and 1 to many allergies. Medications cannot be assigned to a patient history unless there has been a treatment first. ○ Allergy Find Feature Requirement: The system shall allow the user to search for allergies and print all patients with allergies.  How did you ensure that your code was technically sound and efficient? Include screenshots of your code demonstrating that it is the following: ○ Syntactically accurate (style and syntax) ○ Logical (how well your program satisfies the requirements of the assignment) ○ Concise (how thoroughly you have tested your own code) ○ Modular (how you organized your tests)  Defend the effectiveness of your tests by answering the following final questions: ○ Did you find at least five errors? How many did you find in total? ○ What were the errors? Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Milestone Two should be 2 pages in length with double spacing and 12-point Times New Roman font. Any citations should be in APA format. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Level of Testing Defends the level of testing for each of the features using specific examples of testing best practices discussed in the course Defends the level of testing, but fails to fully or appropriately explain the level using specific examples of testing best practices discussed in the course Does not defend the level of testing for each of the features 13 Organizational Approach Defends the organization of tests for each of the features using specific examples of testing best practices discussed in the course Defends the organization of tests, but fails to fully or appropriately explain the level using specific examples of testing best practices discussed in the course Does not defend the organization of tests for each of the features 13 Alignment to Doctor Information Feature Requirement Defends the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement with specific examples Defends the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement, but fails to fully or logically explain using specific examples Does not defend the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement 7 Alignment to Medical Records Feature Requirement Defends the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement with specific examples Defends the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement, but fails to fully or logically explain using specific examples Does not defend the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement 7 Alignment to Allergy Finder Feature Requirement Defends the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement with specific examples Defends the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement, but fails to fully or logically explain using specific examples Does not defend the alignment of the testing approach to the feature requirement 7 Syntactically Accurate Code Defends the accuracy of the code with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Discusses the accuracy of the code, but fails to fully or logically defend with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Does not discuss the accuracy of the code 7 Logical Code Defends the functional logic of the code with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Discusses the functional logic of the code, but fails to fully or logically defend with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Does not discuss the functional logic of the code 7 Concise Code Defends the conciseness of the code with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Discusses the conciseness of the code, but fails to fully or logically defend with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Does not discuss the conciseness of the code 7 Modular Code Defends the modularity of the code with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Discusses the modularity of the code, but fails to fully or logically defend with specific evidence and appropriate screenshots Does not discuss the modularity of the code 7 Effective Tests Defends the effectiveness of the tests by citing at least five identified errors and describing the nature of each Defends the effectiveness of the tests, but fails to cite at least five identified errors and describe the nature of each Does not defend the effectiveness of the tests 20 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 5 Total 100%

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Oct.1 is 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China

I was born in 1995 . 2008 was beijing Olympic Games。it has been 11 years until now . time goes by so fast. I realy can feel China has developing rapidly.

as a chinese student study abord in USA. I realy love my motherland especially as an international student so that feeling is really strong.

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?