Each year, researchers and scholars contribute new insights and discoveries to the field of public administration by publishing articles, books, and reports on a wide range of related topics. As students and future professionals in the field, it is your responsibility to keep up with these developments, since they will inform your practice and help you exceed. In reality, it is difficult to find the time to read in detail all new publications, and yet we cannot afford missing the publication of potentially game-changing discoveries. Book reviews are a convenient way to bridge the gap; these reviews allow the busy professional to quickly gain a sense for the relevance and importance of new publications in the field. Based on reviews, we can decide which books to add to our personal reading list or what to recommend to our colleagues.

• Originality: All papers are assumed to be original work; proper footnoting and acknowledgement of direct quotations is required.
• Length: 8–10 pages, double-spaced.
• Format: Follow the APA style guide.

Suggested outline of the book review:

1. General information: Complete citation, context of the book, and background of author(s)
2. Summary of the problem statement/guiding questions and the major conclusions
3. Basis for conclusions: Data, sources, empirical analysis
4. Relation to literature: Other studies that influenced the author
5. Significance of the study: Your informed judgment about the importance of the study to the fields of public administration and policy analysis
6. Other reviews, if any (only if available)
7. Critical evaluation: What was left out, what should have been included, limitations, opportunities for improvement?

Book:

A republic no more : big government and the rise of
Americanpolitical
corruption

Cost, Jay ; Ebooks Corporation

New York : Encounter Books , 2015

Below is a guide

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Who are the sophists? One would do well to consider some, if not all, of the following: the historical context surrounding the emergence of sophistry; the nature of the material that the sophists claimed to teach; the definitions of, and the relationship between, rhetoric and relativism, respectively, (including the roles of skepticism, agnosticism, and the logos, as well as Protagoras’ claim that “of all things, man is the measure”); the definitions of, and the relationship between, physis and nomos (including the tie to relativism, the collapse of the distinction between knowledge and opinion, and, consequently, what becomes of the logos).

This is prompt that my professor wants me to respond. I have to write from 750 to 1000 words, double spaced, size 12 Times New Roman font, standard margins— and no more than 1,000 words. My professor wants me to engage to the textbook. The textbook is below, chapter 4 is the one relate to the prompt.

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

Paper must be at least 500 words, paper must include a summary and detailed explanation

during research, Primary sources are dimmed as the first-hand accounts of a topic or research which gives the first hand information about something in question while secondary sources are other different accounts of a research which are developed from the primary sources. similarly, general sources are now both primary and secondary sources which are used to provide information and reference about a research work.

examples of primary sources

1.Original documents such as diaries and speeches,

2.records and eyewitness accounts

3.Creative works such as poetry, music, and photography.

examples of secondary sources

1.bibliographies

2.scholarly books and articles

Explanation:

it is very important for the researchers to utilize the primary sources for a study because they contain the original accounts of an event. this includes the original footage and fist hand information which has not been manipulated at all.

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

You will choose any two (2) photos that you think best represent Biodiversity. You will then write a minimum of 200 words per abstract for each photo you chose. This abstract should explain why you believe this image represents Biodiversity. When writing your abstract there should be NO PLAGIARISM or QUOTES.

NO: self-pictures or collages/montages. NO ecosystem photos!

Each photo should contain only ONE organism! Must include genus and species

MUST SITE ALL PHOTO SOURCES

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?

hi i have homework online for 6 chapters some of the chapters has 5 questions and some 25 with unlimited attempt

Looking for a solution written from scratch with No plagiarism and No AI?

WHY CHOOSE US?